President, Data Axle Nonprofit
Artificial intelligence has arrived in the nonprofit sector with promises of efficiency, scale, and data-driven insights. Many AI-powered tools can genuinely help nonprofits do more with limited resources. But of course there’s a catch. The very things that make nonprofits successful, like personal connection, authentic storytelling, and genuine relationships, are exactly what AI can accidentally erode if used carelessly.
The question isn’t whether to use AI. It’s where to draw the line.
This is where AI genuinely shines. Predictive modeling tools can analyze thousands of data points to identify who’s most likely to give, when they’re likely to give, and at what level. This isn’t replacing human judgment, it’s enhancing it by surfacing patterns no human could spot manually. Your development team spends time cultivating relationships with high-potential donors while AI handles the data heavy lifting.
The guardrail: Never let the model make the final decision. Use AI predictions as one input among many, including your team’s relationship knowledge and intuition.
AI, along with automation tools you’ve likely been using for a while now, can help you segment your donor base in sophisticated ways, beyond basic demographics to behavioral patterns, giving history, engagement levels, and affinity markers. This means a major donor gets different touchpoints than a first-time $25 donor. Both feel seen and appreciated appropriately for where they are in their donor journey.
This is fundamentally different from hyper-personalization that tries to make every single communication feel individually crafted. Segmentation says “these 500 people share similar interests and giving patterns, so let’s communicate with them as a group in a relevant way.” Hyper-personalization says “let’s make this one person think we wrote this just for them when we didn’t.” That’s where things can get uncomfortable.
The guardrail: Personalization should feel like you know them, not like you’re surveilling them. Using someone’s giving history to inform which program updates they receive? Smart segmentation. Referencing that they clicked a specific link at 2:47am on Tuesday? Creepy surveillance. If your personalization would make a donor feel watched rather than understood, you’ve gone too far.
Meeting scheduling, basic data entry, CRM updates, email sorting, gift acknowledgment processing—AI and automation can handle these tasks efficiently, freeing up staff time for strategic work. Your team spends less time on administrative busywork and more time on relationship-building and program delivery.
The guardrail: Even automated processes need human oversight. One donor accidentally receiving ten confirmation emails because of a system glitch can damage trust you spent years building.
AI can scan public records, wealth indicators, philanthropic databases, and connection mapping to identify potential major donors or grant opportunities your team might miss. Smaller nonprofits gain access to research capabilities previously available only to organizations with dedicated prospect research teams.
The guardrail: Verify everything. AI can hallucinate connections or outdated information. Always confirm findings before acting on them.
AI can generate first drafts of newsletters, social media posts, grant proposals, or appeal letters based on your prompts and previous content. This can dramatically speed up content production, help break through writer’s block, generate multiple angles on a story, or create content variations for A/B testing.
The guardrail: Every piece of AI-generated content needs human editing. The draft should sound like your organization, include specific stories and details only your team knows, and reflect authentic voice. If it reads like it could be from any nonprofit anywhere, it’s not ready to send. Your donors will notice generic content immediately.
AI can optimize when to send emails, when to make ask calls, and when to follow up based on engagement data and behavioral patterns. This leads to higher open rates and response rates when you reach people at the right moment.
The guardrail: Don’t let optimization override common sense. If a donor just experienced a public tragedy or major life event, no algorithm should be triggering an automated ask. Your team needs to maintain manual oversight of timing for sensitive communications.
AI tools can create graphics, design elements, and even realistic images for social media, reports, or campaigns. Small nonprofits can produce professional-looking visual content without expensive design resources.
The guardrail: Never use AI-generated images to misrepresent your work. If the image shows “beneficiaries” or “program participants” who don’t actually exist, you’ve crossed from efficiency into deception. Use AI for abstract designs, backgrounds, or clearly illustrative content, not to fake documentary evidence of your impact.
Some organizations are tempted to use AI to “personalize” thank you messages at scale, generating unique notes for each donor based on their profile.
Why it’s tempting: You could theoretically thank thousands of donors with seemingly personal messages in minutes.
Why it backfires: Donors can tell. The tone feels off. The details feel generic. And when they discover it’s automated (and they will), they feel manipulated. A handwritten note from a real person builds trust. A convincingly fake “personal” message destroys it.
The alternative: Use AI to identify which donors deserve personal outreach, but write the actual messages yourself. Or create tiered approaches: personal notes for major donors, thoughtful template messages for others, but always written and reviewed by humans.
Your organization’s stories are your most powerful asset. The temptation to use AI to enhance or create beneficiary stories is real, especially when you need content quickly.
Why it’s dangerous: The moment you fabricate or significantly embellish someone’s story—even with good intentions—you’ve compromised your integrity. Donors give because they trust you’re telling them the truth about your impact.
The alternative: Use AI to help structure and organize real stories, but the stories themselves must come from real people, real interviews, and real experiences. AI can help you identify patterns across stories or suggest narrative structures, but never invent the substance.
Some CRM systems now offer AI that can manage entire donor relationships, like automated check-ins, birthday messages, engagement touchpoints, with minimal human involvement.
Why it fails: Relationships aren’t transactional sequences. They’re built on genuine connection, shared values, and mutual respect. Donors who realize they’re in a fully automated relationship track will feel used, not valued.
The alternative: Use AI to remind you when to reach out and suggest conversation topics based on donor history, but the actual relationship work must be human-to-human.
AI is evolving faster than most nonprofits can keep up with. What seemed cutting-edge six months ago is now table stakes. New capabilities emerge weekly. This creates a real tension: nonprofits that ignore AI risk falling behind in efficiency and effectiveness, but those that adopt it too quickly or carelessly risk losing the trust that makes their work possible.
Keeping up with AI developments in the nonprofit sector is a great strategy. Attend webinars, read case studies, and talk to peer organizations about what’s working and what’s not. Then figure out what works best for your team and your audience.
Some organizations are choosing to stay away from AI-powered solutions, while others are incorporating AI tools into every process.
Where are you using (or not using) AI? We’d love to know!
Fill out the form below to connect with one of our nonprofit experts
We respect your privacy. By clicking Contact Us you are agreeing to Data Axle’s Privacy Policy and consent to Data Axle and its subsidiaries and affiliates using your email and phone number for marketing and analytical purposes, including to contact you regarding Data Axle products. You may opt out of all marketing communications at any time.